email page print pageAll Topic Reviews
A New Understanding of Mental Disorders A Theory of Feelings Addictions Memory and the Self"Intimate" Violence against Women1001 Solution-Focused Questions101 Healing Stories101 Things I Wish I'd Known When I Started Using Hypnosis50 Great Myths of Popular Psychology50 Reasons People Give for Believing in a God8 Keys to Body Brain BalanceA Brief History of Modern PsychologyA Conceptual History of PsychologyA Conceptual History of Psychology: Exploring the Tangled Web A Cooperative SpeciesA Guide to Teaching Introductory PsychologyA History of Modern Experimental PsychologyA History of Psychology in AutobiographyA History of Social PsychologyA History of the BrainA History of the MindA Hole in the HeadA Matter of SecurityA Mind of Its OwnA Natural History of Human ThinkingA Place for ConsciousnessA Short Introduction to Promoting Resilience in ChildrenA Social History of PsychologyA Stroll With William JamesA System Architecture Approach to the BrainA Theory of FreedomA Very Bad WizardAbductedAbout FacesAccounts of InnocenceAction, Emotion and WillAdapting MindsAddiction and Self-ControlADHD & MeADHD in AdultsAdieu to GodAdolescence and Body ImageAdult Bipolar DisordersAdvances in Culture and PsychologyAdvances in Identity Theory and ResearchAffect Regulation, Mentalization, and the Development of SelfAffective MappingAgainst EmpathyAgainst HappinessAges and StagesAll Joy and No FunAll Out!All We Have to FearAlterations of ConsciousnessAmerican Psychiatric Publishing Textbook of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical NeurosciencesAn Argument for MindAncient Bodies, Modern LivesAnd BreatheAnimal MadnessAnimal Tool BehaviorAnimals in TranslationAnomalous CognitionAping MankindArtificial ConsciousnessAspects of PsychologismAsperger Syndrome and Your ChildAsperger Syndrome, Adolescence, and IdentityAssessment and Treatment of Childhood Problems, Second EditionAssisted Suicide and the Right to DieAttachedAttention is Cognitive UnisonAutism and the Myth of the Person AloneAutopsy of a Suicidal MindBecoming an Effective PsychotherapistBehavingBehavioral Genetics in the Postgenomic EraBeing No OneBelievingBetween Two WorldsBeyond AppearanceBeyond BlueBeyond BullyingBeyond MadnessBeyond MelancholyBeyond the BrainBeyond the DSM StoryBig DreamsBiofeedback for the BrainBipolar ChildrenBipolar DisorderBipolar KidsBlackwell Handbook of Childhood Cognitive DevelopmentBlind SpotsBlindsight & The Nature of ConsciousnessBlubberlandBlushBodiesBody ConsciousnessBody Image, Eating Disorders, and Obesity in YouthBody SenseBody WorkBorderline Personality DisorderBorderline Personality Disorder and the Conversational ModelBorn DigitalBorn to Be GoodBorn Together - Reared ApartBounceBoundaries in Human RelationshipsBounded RationalityBowen Theory's SecretsBozo SapiensBrain and CultureBrain and the GazeBrain Arousal and Information TheoryBrain BugsBrain Change TherapyBrain Circuitry and Signaling in PsychiatryBrain FictionBrain, Mind, and Human Behavior in Contemporary Cognitive ScienceBrain-Based Therapy with AdultsBrain-WiseBrainstormBrainstormingBraintrustBrainwashingBrandedBreaking Murphy's LawBright-SidedBuddha's BrainBullying and TeasingBuyologyCan't You Hear Them?CaptureCare of the PsycheCartesian LinguisticsCartographies of the MindCerebrum 2007Cerebrum 2010Cerebrum 2015Cerebrum Anthology 2013Changing the SubjectCharacter Strengths and VirtuesCheating LessonsChild and Adolescent Psychological DisordersChildren’s Dreaming and the Development of Consciousness Chomsky NotebookClinical Psychiatry in Imperial GermanyClinical Psychology in Practice ClosureCognition and PerceptionCognition and the BrainCognitive BiologyCognitive DissonanceCognitive FictionsCognitive Mechanisms of Belief ChangeCognitive PragmaticsCognitive ScienceCognitive ScienceCognitive Systems and the Extended MindCognitive Therapy of Anxiety DisordersCognitive Unconscious and Human RationalityCold-Blooded KindnessComing of Age in Second LifeCommunication Issues In Autism And Asperger SyndromeCompassion and Healing in Medicine and SocietyComplementary and Alternative Therapies ResearchComprehending ColumbineConfessions of a SociopathConquering Shame and CodependencyConsciousnessConsciousnessConsciousnessConsciousnessConsciousnessConsciousness ConsciousnessConsciousness and Its Place in NatureConsciousness and LanguageConsciousness and Mental LifeConsciousness and MindConsciousness and the NovelConsciousness and the Social BrainConsciousness EmergingConsciousness RecoveredConsciousness RevisitedConsciousness, Self-Consciousness, and the Science of Being HumanConstructing PainConsumer NeuroscienceContemporary Debates in Cognitive ScienceConversations on ConsciousnessConviction of the InnocentCooperation and Its EvolutionCreating a Life of Meaning and CompassionCredit and BlameCritical New Perspectives on Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity DisorderCritical PsychologyCritical Thinking About PsychologyCross-Cultural PsychologyCrowdsourcingCrueltyCultural Assessment in Clinical PsychiatryCuriousDamasio's Error and Descartes' TruthDangerous and Severe Personality DisorderDaniel DennettDaughters of MadnessDeafness In MindDeath and ConsciousnessDeath of a ParentDecomposing the WillDeep Brain StimulationDeep ChinaDefining DifferenceDefining Psychopathology in the 21st CenturyDelusion and Self-DeceptionDelusions of GenderDennett and Ricoeur on the Narrative SelfDeparting from DevianceDescartes' BabyDescartes's Changing MindDescribing Inner Experience?Desert Islands and Other Texts (1953-1974)Destructive EmotionsDevelopment of Geocentric Spatial Language and CognitionDevelopment of PsychopathologyDialogues on DifferenceDid My Neurons Make Me Do It?Digital HemlockDirty MindsDisgust and Its DisordersDisorders of VolitionDo Apes Read Minds?Do Fish Feel Pain?Does Consciousness Cause Behavior?Doing without ConceptsDrunk Tank PinkEducating People to Be Emotionally IntelligentEffective IntentionsEffective Writing in PsychologyEffortless AttentionEmbodied Minds in ActionEmbracing MindEmbracing UncertaintyEMDR Therapy and Somatic PsychologyEmotion and ConsciousnessEmotion ExperienceEmotion RegulationEmotion, Evolution, And RationalityEmotional IntelligenceEmotionally InvolvedEmotionsEmotionsEmotions and LifeEmotions in Humans and ArtifactsEmotions RevealedEmotions, Aggression, and Morality in ChildrenEmotions, Stress, and HealthEmpathyEnjoymentErotic MoralityEscape Your Own PrisonEssays in Social NeuroscienceEssential Sources in the Scientific Study of ConsciousnessEthical Issues in Forensic Mental Health ResearchEthically Challenged ProfessionsEveryday Mind ReadingEvidence for PsiEvidence-Based Mental Health PracticeEvil MenEvolution and Human BehaviorEvolution and LearningEvolution, Games, and GodEvolution, Gender, and RapeEvolutionary Psychology and ViolenceEvolutionary Psychology as Maladapted PsychologyExacting BeautyExperiences of DepressionExperimenterExplaining the BrainExplaining the BrainExplorations in Neuroscience, Psychology and ReligionExploring TranssexualismExpression and the InnerExtending Self-Esteem ResearchExtraordinary BeliefsFact and Value in EmotionFaking ItFatigue as a Window to the BrainFavorite Activities for the Teaching of PsychologyFeeling GoodFeeling Pain and Being in PainFeelings and EmotionsFinding Meaning, Facing FearsFitting In Is OverratedFive Constraints on Predicting BehaviorFlourishingFlow: The Psychology of Optimal ExperienceFolk Psychological NarrativesFooling HoudiniForever YoungFormulation in Psychology and PsychotherapyFoucault, Psychology and the Analytics of PowerFoundational Issues in Human Brain MappingFoundations of Psychological ThoughtFree Will as an Open Scientific ProblemFreedom And NeurobiologyFreedom EvolvesFrom Axons to IdentityFrom Madness to Mental HealthFrom Neurons to Self-ConsciousnessFrom Passions to EmotionsFrom Philosophy to PsychotherapyFrom Symptom to SynapseFrontiers of ConsciousnessGay, Straight, and the Reason WhyGenerosityGenes, Environment, and PsychopathologyGenetic Nature/CultureGeniusGetting Under the SkinGlued to GamesGoing SaneGot Parts?Group GeniusGrowing Up GirlGuilt, Shame, and AnxietyGut ReactionsHallucinationHandbook New Sexuality StudiesHandbook of Closeness and IntimacyHandbook of Critical PsychologyHandbook of Emotion RegulationHandbook of EmotionsHandbook of Personality DisordersHandbook of PsychopathyHandbook of Self and IdentityHandbook of Self and IdentityHandbook of Spatial CognitionHappinessHappinessHappinessHappinessHappiness at WorkHappiness Is.Happy at LastHard to GetHardwired BehaviorHatredHealing the SplitHidden ResourcesHope and DespairHot ThoughtHot ThoughtHouse and PsychologyHow Animals Affect UsHow Animals GrieveHow Can the Human Mind Occur in the Physical Universe?How Doctors ThinkHow Enlightenment Changes Your BrainHow Families Still MatterHow History Made the MindHow Infants Know MindsHow Many Friends Does One Person Need?How People ChangeHow Professors ThinkHow The Body Shapes The MindHow the Body Shapes the Way We ThinkHow the Mind Explains BehaviorHow the Mind Uses the BrainHow to Change Someone You LoveHow We ReasonHow We RememberHughes' Outline of Modern PsychiatryHumanHuman BondingHuman Reasoning and Cognitive ScienceHume’s Moral Philosophy and Contemporary PsychologyHypnotismHysteriaiBrainIdentifying Hyperactive ChildrenIdentifying the MindiDisorderImagination and the Meaningful BrainImitation and the Social MindImpulse Control DisordersImpulsivityIn an Unspoken VoiceIn Defense of SentimentalityIn DoubtIn Search of HappinessIn the Wake of 9/11Individual and Collective Memory ConsolidationInner Experience and NeuroscienceInner PresenceInside the American CoupleIntegrated Behavioral Health CareIntegrating Evolution and DevelopmentIntegrating Psychotherapy and PharmacotherapyIntegrity and the Fragile SelfIntellectual DisabilityIntelligenceIntelligence, Destiny, and EducationIntentions and IntentionalityInterdependent MindsInterpreting MindsInto the Minds of MadmenIntoxicating MindsIntrospection VindicatedIntuitionInventing PersonalityInvestigating the Psychological WorldIrrationalityIs There Anything Good About Men?Issues for Families, Schools and CommunitiesJane Sexes It UpJoint AttentionJoint AttentionJudgment and Decision MakingJust a DogJust BabiesJuvenile-Onset SchizophreniaKarl JaspersKey Thinkers in PsychologyKidding OurselvesKids of CharacterKilling MonstersKnowing EmotionsLack of CharacterLanguage OriginsLanguage, Consciousness, CultureLanguage, Vision, and MusicLaw, Mind and BrainLess Than HumanLet Kids Be KidsLet's Talk About DeathLiving NarrativeLiving with Mild Cognitive ImpairmentLonelinessLooking for SpinozaLossLOT 2Love at Goon ParkMachine ConsciousnessMacrocognitionMade for Each OtherMadnessMadness and Modernism: Insanity in the light of modern art, literature, and thought Making a Good Brain GreatMaking Habits, Breaking HabitsMaking Minds and MadnessMaking Up the MindMale SexualityMan and WomanMan's Search for MeaningMan, Beast, and ZombieManic MindsManlinessMapping the MindMarking the MindMarvelous Learning AnimalMasculinity Studies and Feminist TheoryMeaningMeaning, Mortality, and ChoiceMedical MusesMeditating SelflesslyMeetings with a Remarkable ManMemoryMemory and DreamsMemory and EmotionMemory And UnderstandingMental BiologyMental IllnessMental Time TravelMetacognitionMetacognition and Theory of MindMethods in MindMindMindMind and BrainMind and ConsciousnessMind GamesMind Games:Mind in LifeMind TimeMind to MindMind, Brain and the Elusive SoulMindful AngerMindfulnessMindfulnessMindfulness and AcceptanceMindfulness-Based Treatment Approaches: Clinician's Guide to Evidence Base and ApplicationsMinding AnimalsMinding MindsMindreadersMindreading AnimalsMinds, Brains, and LawMindsightMindworldsMirrors in the BrainMistakes Were Made (But Not by Me)Models of MadnessMoodMoral Development and RealityMoral MindsMoral Psychology, Volume 1Moral Psychology, Volume 2Moral Psychology, Volume 3Mothers and OthersMotivation and Cognitive ControlMotivational Interviewing: Preparing People For ChangeMovies and the MindMulticulturalism and the Therapeutic ProcessMultiplicityMuses, Madmen, and ProphetsMy Family AlbumMyths about SuicideNarrative IdentitiesNarrative PsychiatryNarratives in PsychiatryNaturalizing Intention in ActionNature and NarrativeNature Via NurtureNeither Bad nor MadNerveNeurobiology and the Development of Human MoralityNeurochemistry of ConsciousnessNeurodiversityNeuroethicsNeuroLogicNeurological Foundations of Cognitive Neuroscience Neuroscience and PhilosophyNo Child Left DifferentNo Two AlikeNot By Genes AloneNot Much Just Chillin'Not So Abnormal PsychologyNurturing the Older Brain and MindOn AnxietyOn Being an Introvert or Highly Sensitive PersonOn Being HumanOn Being MovedOn Deep History and the BrainOn DesireOn KillingOn Nature and LanguageOn PaedophiliaOn PersonalityOn the Frontier of AdulthoodOn the Origins of Cognitive ScienceOn The Stigma Of Mental IllnessOnflowOpen MindsOpening Skinner's BoxOrigin of MindOrigins of PsychopathologyOther MindsOut of Our HeadsOut of the WoodsOvercoming Depersonalization DisorderPanpsychism and the Religious AttitudePanpsychism in the WestParenting and the Child's WorldPassionate EnginesPathologies of the WestPatient-Based Approaches to Cognitive NeurosciencePediatric PsychopharmacologyPeople Types and Tiger StripesPerception & CognitionPerception beyond InferencePerception, Hallucination, and IllusionPersonal Development and Clinical PsychologyPerspectives on ImitationPhantoms in the BrainPhenomenal Concepts and Phenomenal KnowledgePhenomenology and Philosophy of MindPhilosophical Foundations of NeurosciencePhilosophical MidwiferyPhilosophy and HappinessPhilosophy of PsychologyPhilosophy, Neuroscience and ConsciousnessPhrenologyPhysical RealizationPhysics in MindPieces of LightPlaying with FirePositive PsychologyPositive PsychologyPostcards from the Brain MuseumPostpsychiatryPosttraumatic Stress DisorderPoverty and Brain Development During ChildhoodPractical Ethics for PsychologistsPractical Management of Personality DisorderPractical Management of Personality DisorderPredicative MindsPredictably IrrationalPreference, Belief, and SimilarityPrenatal Testosterone in MindPrivileged AccessProcess-Based CBTProcrastinationPromoting Healthy AttachmentsProust Was a NeuroscientistPsychiatric SlaveryPsychiatry as Cognitive NeurosciencePsychiatry, Psychoanalysis, And The New Biology Of MindPsychological AgencyPsychological Concepts and Biological PsychiatryPsychological Dimensions of the SelfPsychologists Defying the CrowdPsychologyPsychologyPsychology and Consumer CulturePsychology and LawPsychology and the Question of AgencyPsychology for ScreenwritersPsychology of Women: A Handbook of Issues and TheoriesPsychology's GhostsPsychology's Interpretive TurnPsychology's TerritoriesPsychopathologyPsychopathyPsychosis and EmotionPsychotherapy, American Culture, and Social PolicyPutnam CampPutting a Name to ItQuantum Memory PowerQuietRadical DistortionRadical Embodied Cognitive ScienceRadical ExternalismRadical GraceRapeRe-Visioning PsychiatryReal MaterialismReality CheckReconstructing Reason and RepresentationReconstructing the Cognitive WorldRecovery in Mental IllnessRecreative MindsRedirectReducing Adolescent RiskRegulating EmotionsRelational BeingRelational Mental HealthRelational Suicide AssessmentReliability in Cognitive NeuroscienceRemembering HomeRemembering Our ChildhoodResearch Advances in Genetics and GenomicsResearching Children's ExperienceResilience in ChildrenRestoring ResilienceRethinking ADHDRethinking Learning DisabilitiesRethinking Middle YearsRethinking the Western Understanding of the SelfRevolution in PsychologyRoadmap to ResilienceRomance and Sex in Adolescence and Emerging AdulthoodSchadenfreudeSchizophrenia RevealedSchizophrenia, Culture, and SubjectivityScience and Pseudoscience in Clinical PsychologyScience and Pseudoscience in Clinical PsychologySecond NatureSecond NatureSecond That EmotionSecond-order Change in PsychotherapySecrets of the MindSee What I'm SayingSee What I'm SayingSeeing and VisualizingSeeing RedSelf and SocietySelf Comes to MindSelf Control in Society, Mind, and BrainSelf-Awareness Deficits in Psychiatric PatientsSelf-CompassionSelf-Consciousness and 'Split' BrainsSelf-RegulationSelf-Representational Approaches to ConsciousnessSelfless InsightSelvesSerial KillersSex at DawnSex on the BrainSex, Time and PowerSexual Coercion in Primates and HumansSexual DisordersSexual FluiditySexual ReckoningsSexualized BrainsShame and GuiltShatteredSimulating MindsSisyphus's BoulderSleepyheadSNAPSocial NeuroscienceSocial NeuroscienceSocial NeuroscienceSocial Psychology and DiscourseSome We Love, Some We Hate, Some We EatSoul DustSparkSpiral of EntrapmentSplendors and Miseries of the BrainSports Hypnosis in PracticeStanding at Water's EdgeStich and His CriticsStillpowerStop OverreactingStructure and Agency in Everyday LifeStructures of AgencyStuffStumbling on HappinessSubjectivity and SelfhoodSubstance Abuse and EmotionSuicidalSupersizing the MindSweet DreamsSynaptic SelfTales from Both Sides of the BrainTalking Oneself SoberTalking to BabiesTaming the Troublesome ChildTargeting AutismTeaching Problems and the Problems of TeachingTeleological RealismTen Years of Viewing from WithinTestosterone RexThat's DisgustingThe 5 Elements of Effective ThinkingThe Accidental MindThe Age of EmpathyThe Altruism EquationThe Altruistic BrainThe American Psychiatric Publishing Textbook of Clinical PsychiatryThe Anatomy of BiasThe Anxious BrainThe Archaeology of MindThe Art and Science of MindfulnessThe Art InstinctThe Art of HypnosisThe Asymmetrical BrainThe Bifurcation of the SelfThe Big Book of ConceptsThe Big DisconnectThe Birth of IntersubjectivityThe Birth of the MindThe Blackwell Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge ManagementThe Blank SlateThe Body Has a Mind of Its OwnThe Bounds of CognitionThe Boy Who Was Raised as a DogThe BrainThe BrainThe Brain and the Meaning of LifeThe Brain SupremacyThe Brain That Changes ItselfThe Brain's Way of HealingThe Brain: Big Bangs, Behaviors, and BeliefsThe Cambridge Handbook of Cognitive ScienceThe Cambridge Handbook of Situated CognitionThe Character of ConsciousnessThe Chemistry Between UsThe Choice EffectThe Clinical Science of Suicide PreventionThe Cognitive Approach to Conscious MachinesThe Cognitive Behavioral Workbook for Anxiety: A Step-By-Step ProgramThe Cognitive NeurosciencesThe Cognitive-Emotional BrainThe College Fear FactorThe Commercialization of Intimate LifeThe Compass of PleasureThe Compassionate ConnectionThe Concepts of ConsciousnessThe Conscious BrainThe Conscious SelfThe Consuming InstinctThe Creating BrainThe Creative BrainThe Crucible of ConsciousnessThe Crucible of ExperienceThe Cure WithinThe Dao of NeuroscienceThe Developing MindThe Developing MindThe Development of PsychopathologyThe Disappearance of the Social in American Social PsychologyThe Dissolution of MindThe Duty to ProtectThe Educated ParentThe Ego TunnelThe Elephant in the RoomThe Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human ExperienceThe Emotional Foundations of PersonalityThe Emotional Journey of the Alzheimer's FamilyThe Encultured BrainThe Encyclopedia of StupidityThe Enduring Self in People with Alzheimer'sThe Epidemiology of SchizophreniaThe Essential DifferenceThe Ethical BrainThe Evolution of BeautyThe Evolution of ChildhoodThe Evolution of CooperationThe Evolution of LanguageThe Evolution of MindThe Evolving BrainThe Executive BrainThe Faces of TerrorismThe Feeling BrainThe Feeling of What HappensThe First IdeaThe Folly of FoolsThe Folly of FoolsThe Folly of FoolsThe Foundations of Cognitive ArchaeologyThe Fundamentalist MindsetThe GapThe Gender TrapThe Geography of BlissThe Gift of ShynessThe Good LifeThe Good LifeThe Happiness HypothesisThe Happiness of PursuitThe Health Psychology HandbookThe Healthy Aging BrainThe Heart of TraumaThe High Price of MaterialismThe History of PsychologyThe Human FaceThe Human SparkThe Hypomanic EdgeThe Imagery DebateThe Immeasurable MindThe Imprinted BrainThe Incredible Shrinking MindThe Innate MindThe Innate MindThe Integrated SelfThe Intentional BrainThe Language of ThoughtThe Languages of the BrainThe Lexicon of Adlerian PsychologyThe Lie DetectorsThe Lives of the BrainThe Lonely AmericanThe Lust for BloodThe Madness of WomenThe Male BrainThe Man Who Lost His LanguageThe Man Who Shocked the WorldThe Man Who Tasted ShapesThe Man Who Wasn't ThereThe Matter of the MindThe Mature MindThe Mean Girl MotiveThe Meaning of EvilThe Meaning of OthersThe Meaning of the BodyThe Measure of MadnessThe Measure of MindThe Medicalization of Everyday LifeThe Mind and the BrainThe Mind in ContextThe Mind of the ChildThe Mind of the HorseThe Mind's EyeThe Mind, the Body and the WorldThe Mind-Gut ConnectionThe Mindful BrainThe Misleading MindThe Moral MindThe Most Dangerous AnimalThe Most Human HumanThe Mother FactorThe Myth of ChoiceThe Myth of Depression as DiseaseThe Myth of Mirror NeuronsThe Myth of Self HelpThe Myth of Self-EsteemThe Myth of the Spoiled ChildThe Nature of the SelfThe Necessity Of MadnessThe Neuro RevolutionThe Neuron and the MindThe Neuropsychology of the UnconsciousThe Neuroscience of Human RelationshipsThe Neuroscience of PsychotherapyThe Neuroscience of Psychotherapy: Healing the Social BrainThe New BrainThe New Science of DreamingThe New Science of the MindThe New UnconsciousThe Normal PersonalityThe Origins of FairnessThe Overflowing BrainThe Oxford Companion to the MindThe Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of MindThe Paradoxical PrimateThe Perfectionist's HandbookThe Peripheral MindThe Phenomenology ReaderThe Philosopher's Secret FireThe Philosophical BabyThe Political MindThe Politics of HappinessThe Positive Side of Negative EmotionsThe Postnational SelfThe Postpartum EffectThe Power of PlayThe Praeger Handbook of TranssexualityThe Present Moment in Psychotherapy and Everyday LifeThe Primate MindThe Prism of GrammarThe Psychobiology of Trauma and Resilience Across the LifespanThe Psychological Construction of EmotionThe Psychology of Good and EvilThe Psychology of Good and EvilThe Psychology of HappinessThe Psychology of LifestyleThe Psychology of Religious FundamentalismThe Psychology of Science and the Origins of the Scientific MindThe Psychology of Science and the Origins of the Scientific MindThe Psychology of SpiritualityThe Psychology of StereotypingThe Psychology of SuperheroesThe Psychophysiology of Self-AwarenessThe Pursuit of PerfectThe Quest for Mental HealthThe Rational ImaginationThe Ravenous BrainThe Reasons of LoveThe Righteous MindThe Routledge Companion to Philosophy of PsychologyThe Routledge Companion to Philosophy of PsychologyThe Routledge Handbook of ConsciousnessThe Science of EvilThe Science of Intimate RelationshipsThe Science of Shame and its Treatment The Second SelfThe Secret History of EmotionThe Secret Lives of BoysThe Self and Its EmotionsThe Self-Sabotage CycleThe Sense of SelfThe Sensitive SelfThe Shape of ThoughtThe Social AnimalThe Social Nature of Mental IllnessThe Social Neuroscience of EmpathyThe Social Psychology of Good and EvilThe Social Psychology of MoralityThe Social Psychology of MoralityThe Story of Intellectual DisabilityThe Structure of ThinkingThe Survivors ClubThe Talking ApeThe Teenage BrainThe Tell-Tale BrainThe Temperamental ThreadThe Tender CutThe Tending InstinctThe Time ParadoxThe Trauma MythThe Trauma of Psychological TortureThe Trauma of Psychological TortureThe Trouble with IllnessThe True PathThe Truth About GriefThe Turing TestThe Uncertain SciencesThe Undoing ProjectThe Unhappy ChildThe Upside of IrrationalityThe War for Children's MindsThe Well-Tuned BrainThe Wild Girl, Natural Man, and the MonsterThe Winner's BrainThe Wisdom in FeelingThe Woman RacketThe World in My Mind, My Mind in the WorldThe Wow ClimaxThe Yipping TigerThemes, Issues and Debates in PsychologyTheoretical Issues in Psychology: An IntroductionTheory of AddictionTheory of MindThings and PlacesThink CatThink Confident, Be ConfidentThinking about AddictionThinking and SeeingThis Emotional Life: In Search of Ourselves...and HappinessThought and LanguageThought in a Hostile WorldTo Have and To Hurt:Toward an Evolutionary Biology of LanguageToward Replacement Parts for the BrainTrauma and Human ExistenceTrauma, Tragedy, TherapyTreating Attachment DisordersTreating Self-InjuryTreating Self-Injury: A Practical GuideTrue to Our FeelingsTrusting the Subject?Understanding and Treating Borderline Personality DisorderUnderstanding ConsciousnessUnderstanding ParanoiaUnderstanding PeopleUnderstanding TerrorismUnderstanding the BrainUndoing Perpetual StressUnlock the Genius WithinUnsettled MindsUnstrange MindsUnthinkingUnthoughtUs and ThemViolent PartnersVirtue, Vice, and PersonalityVision and MindVisual AgnosiaWarrior's DishonourWe Who Are DarkWednesday Is Indigo BlueWelcome to Your BrainWhat Do Women Want?What Dying People WantWhat Have We DoneWhat Intelligence Tests MissWhat Is an Emotion: Classic and Contemporary ReadingsWhat Is Emotion?What is Intelligence?What Is Mental Illness?What Is Thought?What Makes Your Brain Happy and Why You Should Do the Opposite What the Best College Students DoWhat the Dog SawWhat We Know about Emotional IntelligenceWhat We Say MattersWhat's Wrong With Morality?When Boys Become BoysWhen Perfect Isn't Good EnoughWhen the Impossible HappensWhen Walls Become DoorwaysWho's Been Sleeping in Your HeadWho's in Charge?Why Humans Like to CryWhy Love MattersWhy Lyrics LastWhy People CooperateWhy People Die by SuicideWhy Sex Matters: A Darwinian Look at Human BehaviorWhy Smart People Can Be So StupidWhy the Mind is Not a ComputerWhy Us?Why We LieWhy We LoveWhy We SleepWider than the SkyWilliam James at the BoundariesWilling, Wanting, WaitingWittgenstein And PsychologyWomen and Child Sexual AbuseWorking MindsYoga and PsychologyYou Are What You RememberYoung Minds in Social WorldsYour Brain on CubsYour Brain on FoodYour Brain on Food: How Chemicals Control Your Thoughts and Feelings,Your Brain on YogaYour Child in the BalanceZombies and Consciousness
Stich and His Critics is a collection of ten papers exposing and criticizing the philosophy of Stephen Stich, along with his replies. This format is conducive to understanding but the state of the art nature of the content means that it is not accessible for the philosophically uninitiated. The main themes of this wide-ranging book are the role of folk psychology in science, how words refer to the world, epistemology, everyday mindreading, and innateness in cognitive science. The following are outlines of the main arguments and replies.
Stich used to be an eliminativist about representational content. That is he denied that people's mental states like beliefs and desires have subjects in the way that we ordinarily imagine. In Is There a Role for Representational Content in Scientific Psychology Francis Egan notes that Stich is no longer an eliminativist but has never explained why. She thinks he is right to have stopped because representational content is required in several areas of psychology. Computational psychological modeling needs content to link abstract computationally defined states to their psychological context at the sub-personal level. Attribution theory and developmental psychology use representational content to work at the personal level.
Stich is not convinced that the content used in computational psychology is really like that of folk psychology, which is what is under discussion. He says content does seem useful to cognitive social, developmental, and abnormal psychology. But without a detailed philosophical account of the explanatory structure of these areas we cannot be completely sure. Thus, given the vagueness of content, we cannot be sure that realism about it is justified. He also notes that he no longer believes in the method by which he originally worked out the concept of content that he attributed to folk psychology. The process of consulting the intuitions of philosophers to discover those of the folk has come under a lot of pressure recently. There is evidence from surveys of folk, under the banner of 'experimental philosophy', that their intuitions are quite different from those of philosophers. The discussion is thus premature.
This is a nice illustration of the difficulties for philosophers in compromising with experimental philosophy. Stich, himself an 'experimental philosopher', could have only said we don't know what content is like in folk psychology so we don't know if it's real. But instead he both "plays the game" with Egan, in assuming that our intuitions are evidence of the folk's, and also declares that this assumption is unjustified. It seems Stich is putting a buck each way in this case.
In Representationalism Reconsidered Peter Godfrey-Smith is interested in explaining how representation is being useful in cognitive science given that its physical underpinnings are not properly understood. The kind of representation he is talking about is the basic sense in which one thing stands for something else. His idea is that representation is often being used as a model. The sense of model he is using is from some recent philosophy of science, allowing for flexibility in the ways and degrees to which theoretical posits resemble their objects. He thinks that the way representation is discussed and employed indicates a model-based approach though this has not been explicitly acknowledged.
PGS argues that one of the consequences of this view, presented in detail elsewhere, is that representation should only be employed in certain situations. When the representation model is employed in an explanatory way it requires a real reader mechanism rather than just an abstract one. There must be something that uses the representativeness. Stich had criticized this by pointing out the common useful postulation of abstract mechanisms at an intermediate level of a functional analysis. PGS says here that this can be a useful approach, but it should not be taken literally, as when explanation is intended.
In his reply Stich agrees that a more complex theory is required to explain the use of representation in cognitive science but holds off on weighing in on PGS's account until it is presented in more detail. He wonders 'aloud' whether this may explain how representation is being useful despite it's vagueness. Readers may find PGS's discussion is speculatively interesting but that he hasn't really presented evidence that this is how representation is being used.
In On Determining What There Isn't Michael Devitt agrees with Stich that semantic assent is unhelpful in doing ontology. We should not base our beliefs about what exists on beliefs about how words refer to the world. But unlike Stich he thinks that we can discover the correct reference relation, by looking for the common and distinctive properties of paradigm cases of reference. In response to Stich's view that it is unlikely that there is a theoretically interesting reference relation, Devitt points out the popular truth-referential theories of meaning in linguistics. These theories say that meaning is determined by propositions being true if the parts of the world that are referred to have the properties referred to. As the use of the meaning of mental states in social science is common meaning is theoretically useful. Thus since meaning is defined by reference, reference is theoretically useful.
Stich replies that Devitt has convinced him that it is not clear and accepted that reference is not used in scientific explanation. But he thinks his plan for discovering its nature is under described. That is because some recent experimental philosophy has indicated that certain intuitions about reference vary across cultures. These intuitions define significantly different reference relations so there will not be common and distinctive properties of a set of cases that doesn't distinguish between them. But how to justify which side to take is not obvious. He concludes by stating his alliance with deflationists about reference who think there is no objective reference relation.
This highlights the fact that Devitt gives no reason to think that there is an objective reference relation, but proceeds by assuming we all know its paradigm cases. On the other hand if there were a good case for an objective reference relation there is no obvious reason why there couldn't be more than one that was theoretically interesting. Then perhaps in principle Devitt's plan could work. Different cultures could have different reference relations.
In Eliminativism and the Theory of Reference Frank Jackson agrees with Stich that there is no objective reference relation but argues that there had better be one that can be standard for doing ontology. Rather than offering a solution he offers a way to find one. The right reference relations for the ontological context are those which explain how we report indefinitely many beliefs with sentences in a learnable, public language. There will be some variation but also much agreement.
Stich replies that this account cannot be right because Jackson's account does not determine the reference of thoughts, only spoken and written language, and ontology can be done in thought. As Jackson's view of language defines meaning through the thoughts of the language-user it cannot then define the meaning of those thoughts through the language in which they are used.
In Why Isn't Stich an ElimiNativist? Fiona Cowie considers whether the concept of innateness should be eliminated from our discourse due to its being impossible to analyse. Innateness is roughly the property of being naturally developing regardless of circumstances, though one main point of this paper is that it is impossible to define. She first shows how a great many proposals for defining innateness all fail to correctly classify paradigm cases of innateness. Yet research on innateness is flourishing in cognitive science. To help us understand what is going on she describes two cases from the history of science where concepts that were apparently hopelessly confused went on to become crucial: elements and genes. Elements in 1750 consisted of phlegma, spirit, oil, salt, and earth, and of course they were no use. There are two perspectives on genes, functional and biological, and most of the time they have been hopelessly incompatible. Yet following up on both has been crucial to scientific progress. Her point is basically that we have to use the concepts we have until we have something better to put in their place.
Stich is convinced by Cowie both that innateness is troublesome and that it is as yet irreplaceable. But it seems as though they are mistaking the knowledge that is gained when a concept is shown to be mistaken for a reason to keep using the concept after the fact. Clearly concepts should not be discarded until we are sure that they are useless. But we should still only posit what best explains the available evidence. Readers may feel that Cowie's paper shows that innateness does not do this.
In A Defence of the Use of Intuitions Ernest Sosa defends analytic epistemology, the process of using intuitions to discover the nature of knowledge. His main project is to challenge the claim made by Joshua Alexander, Jonathan Weinberg, Shaun Nichols, and Stich that their recent surveys of cross-cultural epistemic intuitions show cultural variation that undermines analytic epistemology. He points out that the response schema allowed only two responses and there could have been significantly more agreement if a third option was included. He also claims that different cultures may import different background information to the scenarios employed in the surveys, or different ideas of 'knowledge'. Stich has replied that if cultures had different ideas of knowledge that would still be problematic because we would not know which is the right or best one. Sosa thinks this is really obscure because we can just value both.
Stich claims that finding agreement between the cultural positions the surveys uncovered looks to be a difficult task. He accepts that cultural epistemological diversity has not been shown beyond philosophical doubt. But he argues that the stakes are very high for it, as the entire western tradition of philosophy is founded on the method of intuition, so more research should be done. As for the option of valuing both ideas of knowledge he distinguishes his philosophical project from Sosa's. He thinks Sosa is interested in finding the nature of his own culture's concept of knowledge, whereas he himself is interested in finding the best method of building knowledge, and the first will not take care of the second. The question then becomes why does the fact that different cultures build knowledge in different ways change whether our way is the best? Was the idea that everyone reasons the same way ever really good evidence that this is the best or only way?
In Reflections on Cognitive and Epistemic Diversity Michael Bishop agrees that Stich's original and recent attacks on analytic epistemology work but advocates a different positive epistemology. Stich advocates pragmatism, adopting those methods of inquiry that maximize the probability of getting what you intrinsically value. That is because he thinks that different cultures interpret belief brain states as different propositions, so whether beliefs are true will be culturally relative. Thus true beliefs will not be intrinsically valued by most people. Also there is evidence from medicine that unrealistically optimistic beliefs are beneficial, so true beliefs are not always instrumentally valuable either. Bishop accepts these arguments but argues for strategic reliabilism on pragmatic grounds. This is a complex view advocating truth-reliable methods of reasoning but unconscious avoidance of thinking about things where true beliefs are not pragmatic. His basic argument is that we are attracted to believing the truth so his method will be much easier to take up than Stich's.
In his reply Stich denies that strategic reliabilism has been shown to be pragmatically better than pragmatism since no empirical evidence has been given to support the claim that we are strongly attracted to the truth. He asserts that Bishop's record suggests that if there were such evidence he would have included it. Also what is required is that we would still be attracted to the truth even after understanding Stich's arguments against its value. It is hard to understand the idea that people do not tend to believe what they think is true. The same goes for the argument against the intrinsic value of truth. It seems to say that holding a belief is holding to a brain state rather than a proposition.
In Simulation Theory and Cognitive Neuroscience Alvin Goldman defends a simulation theory of mindreading with neuroscientific evidence, from Stich and Nichols' claim that simulation theory is not a natural or theoretically interesting category. The specific theory he is defending is that we discover what other people think and feel by our neurological states resembling theirs. He presents evidence that neurological resemblance occurs in non-mindreading activities. The same areas of people's brains are activated when they perform, imagine, and observe the same actions. Then evidence that it also happens in various kinds of low-level mindreading activities (those concerning people's sensations rather than their beliefs or desires). The same brain areas are active in feeling and observing disgust, pain, or touch. Also people whose capacities for disgust, fear, or anger are removed cannot recognize the corresponding emotion in the faces of other people as well as control groups can.
In response Stich says that this account of mindreading is not natural or interesting because it says that when someone fails to read someone else's mind correctly they have not engaged in simulation at all. That is because simulation is neurological resemblance and they failed to achieve it. Stich points out that, in his book, Goldman avoids this problem in the case of high-level mindreading. He allows for simulation to fail if it is directed towards mindreading as a goal, whether consciously or otherwise. This allows for mistaken simulation based mindreading where the goal of resemblance is there even if the resemblance is not. But Stich notes there is no evidence that such unconscious aims exist but there is evidence of lots of unconscious mindreading.
Goldman could respond that unconscious aims have been posited in dual processing research, where aims that have been taken on consciously have been found to influence automatic processing preconsciously. This gives some reason to think unconscious aims could figure into the mindreading picture, but it is far from evidence that they do. It is surely theoretically interesting that when we observe the sensations or actions of others we use the same part of our brain as when we feel or imagine them ourselves. What is lacking is any reason to think that this is related to mindreading.
Stich and Nichols' account of mindreading has a good chance of being right according to Kim Sterelny in The Triumph of a Reasonable Man: Stich, Mindreading, and Nativism, and if it is it strengthens his arguments against mindreading being innate. It says that quasi-perceptual mechanisms play an important role in desire-reading through reading of emotional expression and direction of attention, requiring less of innate belief and desire concepts. It does not require that we represent other agents' planning processes, instead allowing us to use our own planner module with estimations of their goals. It requires little innate information because it breaks down belief and desire understanding into learnable chunks.
Stich replies that both the terms innate and concept are controversial and because Sterelny does not clarify his use of them (and in fact acknowledges their opacity) he does not make much headway on whether belief and desire concepts are innate. As for the learnable chunks he thinks no one has said they were all learned at once, even Leslie, a nativist about mindreading and the only major mindreading figure quoted in Sterelny's article. Sterelny cites a conference as evidence of the appeal of the main argument for nativism that he considers. This may be a signal that the view he is opposing is more often espoused in conversation than in print.
In the anthropologically informative Against Moral Nativism Jesse Prinz says that morality is universal in being found in every known culture but we do not have mechanisms specifically evolved for it. To show this he defines three degrees of moral universality that may be claimed for morality and proceeds to present empirical evidence against their showing moral nativism. The most demanding degree of universality he considers is that specific moral norms are universal. He considers the norms against harming the innocent, disobeying authorities, and incest, and shows that all are applied so differently that no specific variant is in fact universal. Next he considers whether having moral norms about the same things is innate. Against this he says that it's plausible that the three moral schemas he has considered were culturally rather than biologically evolved. Further he shows that for each there is variation in whether they are in fact moralized, taking moralization to be the attachment of the emotions anger and guilt. Finally he accepts that we universally form moral norms in general, but denies that we have innate mechanisms to do so given that neither anger or guilt are domain specific or hard to learn.
Stich's main response is to question the sense of morality Prinz intends. He separates morality as a natural kind of thing from morality as a folk theoretical thing and says that Prinz's claims do not make sense from either point of view. If he intends to discuss a folk theory of morality he fails because his theory includes norms about food, burial, religion, and etiquette that evoke anger and guilt but do not seem moral. If he intends a natural kind of thing then why is it better than the account of norms that Stich and Sripada set out that differs from folk theory in just the same ways. Stich thinks this problem is typical of empirically minded moral psychology at the moment. One way that this seems unfair is that Stich offers no evidence that the norms he claims seem not to be moral seem that way to most folk. However it is certainly fair to say that Prinz does not make it clear which he means.
The tone of the book is almost universally one of mutual respect and generosity in interpretation, with the exchange between Rutgers colleagues Goldman and Stich the only one where tempers may have flared a little. One anomaly is that the replies are all at the end, out of order, and not indexed so that if you want to read them after each chapter, as seems most natural, you have to leaf through to find them. Maybe Stich intended the replies as a piece but it is not obvious that the order has any advantage. The contributors are all experts in their fields and the contributions all well-informed and thought-provoking. In the introduction Murphy and Bishop display editorial commitment in providing relevant background information to many of the issues.
The book as a whole may be less useful in being so wide-ranging, but it is connected in representing a strongly empirical approach. Overall it is an excellent collection.
© 2009 Robin Aldridge-Sutton
Robin Aldridge-Sutton is a philosophy MA student and tutor at Victoria University of Wellington. His research focus is the role of intuitions in philosophy, particularly the free will debate.