Burston is well aware that Laing’s declining reputation is linked to Laing’s money problems and his increasingly desperate attempts to solve them, his often irresponsible public behavior, and his intellectual decline. Laing started out as a powerful intellectual force, and then disgraced himself. It can be hard to remember why he was ever taken seriously. But Laing’s work was important in the 1960s and 1970s, and Burston makes a good case that it still has relevance today.

Laing’s childhood is covered very quickly, and Burston soon gets into Laing’s intellectual development. It is striking both how passionate he was about his work, and how bitter were the arguments he had with peers and colleagues. It is also clear that the label of “antipsychiatrist,” which Laing disliked, does not describe him well. Laing was a supporter of the idea of psychiatry, while a trenchant critic of the way it was often practiced. Burston’s aim is to present Laing’s point of view systematically: his way of doing this is to not only tell the story of Laing’s life, but also in the final hundred pages of the book, to set out and appraise Laing’s ideas more systematically.

While he greatly respects Laing’s contributions, Burston is no blindly following disciple of Laing. He makes thoughtful and clear criticisms of Laing’s ideas and actions. He explains Laing’s position in comparison with other theories in psychology and philosophy such as behaviorism and existentialism. Furthermore, he shows the roots of Laing’s apparently bizarre later enthusiasms (such as the rebirthing movement) in his early work.

What is less clear after reading Burston’s intellectual biography is whether it is worth it for modern critics of psychiatry to make the effort to master the subtleties of Laing’s approach. Laing certainly provides a possible starting point for those unhappy with the unrelenting reductionism of psychiatry, but is it the best starting point? One can only make this judgment through comparing Laing’s approach with those of other theorists such as Foucault, Szasz, and feminist authors. For my part, I suspect Laing’s thought was too schematic and eclectic, and that his project was not completed enough. While critical psychiatry should acknowledge its influences, it does not need to root itself in such mixed soil.

To buy this book from Barnes & Noble.com, click here: The Wing of Madness : The Life and Work of R. D. Laing

.